Disco Corp
- Board oversight
- Named executive owner
- Withdrawal mechanism
- Direct lobbying governance
- Regular monitoring cycle
Disco Corp discloses a general oversight structure that could extend to its policy engagement, noting that progress on its climate goals is overseen by "最高ç'°å¢ƒè²¬ä»»è€...ã§ã‚る執行役常務ã‚'å§"å"¡é•·ã€ã¾ãŸä»£è¡¨åŸ·è¡Œå½¹ç¤¾é•·ãŠã‚ˆã³åŸ·è¡Œå½¹å‰¯ç¤¾é•·ã‚'å§"å"¡ã¨ã™ã‚‹å...¨ç¤¾ç'°å¢ƒå§"å"¡ä¼šã‚'定期的ã«é - ‹å‚¬ã - ã€çµŒå - ¶ä¼šè°ãƒ»å - ç· å½¹ä¼šã§ä»˜è°ãƒ»å ±å'Šã - ã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™." This indicates that a named committee chaired by the Chief Environmental Officer and including the CEO and EVP periodically reviews climate-related matters and reports to the board, suggesting at least some formal review step for ensuring "å¤ - 部エンゲージメント活動ãŒå½"ç¤¾ã®æ° - å€™ã‚³ãƒŸãƒƒãƒˆãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒˆã¨æ•´åˆã - ã¦ã„ã‚‹ã‹" as asked in the disclosure. However, the company provides no further detail on how it monitors or manages lobbying positions, offers no policy or process for aligning direct advocacy or trade-association membership with its climate targets, and does not describe any mechanism for challenging, correcting or exiting misaligned associations. Because the evidence is limited to high-level committee oversight without a specific lobbying-alignment framework, this indicates only limited governance around climate lobbying.
This assessment is part of the Lobbying Governance Index, covering 8,500 companies scored on whether they have processes to oversee their climate lobbying. See all companies in Asia-Pacific or all companies in Japan.