Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Amgen has instituted a structured oversight framework for monitoring its climate-related lobbying, exemplified by the dedicated disclosures and targeted reviews of its trade association memberships, yet it does not provide a clear mechanism for aligning its direct lobbying activities with its climate objectives. Specifically, Amgen publishes a section titled “Results of Our Annual Review of U.S. Trade and Industry Associations That Conduct Climate Lobbying and Alignment on Climate Lobbying,” in which “our process and methodology included reviewing our memberships and conducting an assessment of climate-related policy and advocacy positions to determine alignment with the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting the global average temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.” The company commits that “if misalignment … is identified in the future, we will consider whether or not to remain a member” and that “we will continue to closely monitor these associations,” demonstrating a proactive approach to governing indirect lobbying. Governance oversight is provided by Amgen’s Board and its Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee, which “oversees our government affairs activities, including our political contributions … public policy positions,” and by the Senior Vice President, Global Government Affairs and Policy, leading the Global Government Affairs and Policy team under the committee’s oversight. However, the company states that “While we do not directly lobby for climate change,” and we found no evidence of a defined process to ensure that any direct lobbying is systematically aligned with its climate commitments, suggesting that direct lobbying alignment is not clearly governed.
View Sources
|
C |