Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Sopra Steria Group articulates a high-level approach to climate-related engagement but presents minimal evidence of a dedicated governance process for lobbying alignment. It affirms that “Our attached Environment Policy declares the company's commitment to climate action” and that “People responsible for the climate strategy are also responsible for engagement,” indicating that climate and advocacy roles reside within the same team. The company highlights proactive outreach to stakeholders “such as national governments, the UN Global Compact, the SBTi, the CDP, the European Climate Pact, the French Energy Agency ADEME” and industry bodies like “DigitalEurope” and the “EGDC,” yet it does not disclose any named individual or formal body tasked with reviewing these engagements, nor does it specify procedures for monitoring or managing direct or indirect lobbying activities. While its 2021 and 2022 URDs “explain our strategy and processes, and report our performance, independently verified,” and the company answers “Yes” to having “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” we found no evidence of a board sign-off mechanism, a structured review process, or criteria for assessing its participation in trade associations against its climate objectives.
View Sources
|
D |