Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Moderate
|
Carmila SA describes a structured approach to aligning its engagement and lobbying activities with its climate strategy, noting that "The CSR Director is in charge of the relations with stakeholders and of lobbying actions" and that she "defines and coordinates the implementation of the Group CSR strategy and internal/external engagements, including the involvement on Climate Change." The process is supported by internal oversight, as "Each business department appoints a committee responsible for the projects monitoring and reporting," and "An annual assessment per country/Business Unit is developed in order to check the projects’ progress and the alignment with the Group’s strategic goals," which indicates a recurring monitoring mechanism. The company also affirms a "public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." However, the description focuses on direct oversight of stakeholder engagement, and we found no evidence of specific mechanisms to manage indirect lobbying through trade associations or to adjust or withdraw from associations with misaligned positions, nor is there a detailed audit or published report on its climate-related lobbying activities.
View Sources
|
C
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Carmila provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It notes that, through membership of industry bodies such as the French Council of Shopping Centres (CNCC) and FSIF, it takes part in committees that “monitor and anticipate changes in laws and regulations” and combine “lobbying and communication actions,” showing that the company uses association participation as a lobbying channel but without naming the government departments or individual officials it seeks to influence. The disclosure refers generally to policy themes—sustainability reporting requirements, verification and audit rules, and broader climate-change initiatives—yet it does not identify any specific bill, regulation or directive that the company has directly sought to influence. Likewise, the objectives described, such as promoting CSR actions to improve the image of shopping centres and supporting “legislative and regulatory proactivity,” remain aspirational and do not spell out concrete legislative changes or measurable climate outcomes the company wants to secure. Taken together, the information indicates some engagement but lacks the detail needed to demonstrate robust transparency about the policies addressed, the targets approached, and the precise outcomes sought.
|
D
|