Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Siemens AG provides a very detailed account of its climate-related lobbying. The company names a wide range of identifiable measures it has worked on, including the Energy Efficiency Directive, Renewable Energy Directive, Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation, EU F-Gas Regulation, EU Taxonomy, the German Energieeffizienzgesetz, the U.S. National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program and the Inflation Reduction Act, among many others, demonstrating full transparency on the specific policies it seeks to influence. It also explains how it lobbies and who it targets: disclosures reference “meetings with EU decision-makers, including European Commission, European Parliament and Member States”, “several meetings with members of congress and the administration”, “participation in round tables at BMWI”, submission of position papers, responses to consultations, joint industry letters, high-level events such as the “ERT Green Deal Event with Frans Timmermans”, and ongoing engagement through trade associations and ad-hoc coalitions. Finally, Siemens is explicit about the outcomes it pursues, for example calling for “increasing energy efficiency targets” in the EED, seeking “no cap for renewable energy” and lower charges for green hydrogen in the EEG, pressing for CBAM rules that “avoid undue administrative burdens” while ensuring WTO compliance, advocating that AFIR cover electric catenary systems for trucks, and urging “an early review of the regulation, covering SF6” in the F-gas file. The combination of numerous specific policies, clearly described mechanisms and named targets, and multiple detailed policy positions illustrates a high level of transparency across all aspects of the company’s climate-policy lobbying. | 4 |