Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Industrial & Infrastructure Fund Investment Corp provides a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” suggesting a high-level intent to align its advocacy with climate objectives; however, we found no evidence of any specific governance mechanisms—such as a named oversight body or formal monitoring procedure—to ensure that its direct or indirect lobbying activities adhere to this commitment, nor any detailed process for reviewing alignment of its policy engagement.
View Sources
|
D
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Industrial & Infrastructure Fund Investment Corp provides only limited transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It does identify two specific policy areas it has engaged on – “エネルギー効率最低要件” (minimum energy-efficiency requirements) and “Energy attribute certificate systems” in Japan – which shows some clarity on the policies being addressed. The company also reveals one clear mechanism and target, noting that it “委員として参加し、意見を述べている” in a study group hosted by Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, indicating direct engagement with that ministry; however, no other mechanisms or specific policymaking targets are named. Finally, the company states its stance as “Support with no exceptions” and that the engagement is aligned with the Paris Agreement, but it does not explain what concrete legislative changes, amendments, or quantitative goals it seeks. Together, these disclosures give a basic outline of the company’s climate-policy lobbying but leave significant gaps in detail about how it lobbies and the precise results it hopes to achieve.
|
D
|