Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd has instituted formal committees to govern its climate-related policy engagement, though the framework does not fully clarify how lobbying activities are managed across all channels. The company explains that its “Climate Commitments, Climate Strategy and overall sustainability policies are reviewed with CP’s Executive team and the Board level Risk and Sustainability (RSC) Committee,” and that its “cross-functional Sustainability Steering Committee (SSC) oversees the implementation, monitoring and reporting of sustainability and climate change performance.” It further notes that a key component of its Climate Strategy is to drive internal alignment while engaging suppliers, customers, rail transportation peers and policymakers to help lead industry-wide change through “strategic engagements … including topics related to cap and trade, carbon taxes, fuel efficiency standards, renewable fuel standards and emissions reporting programs.” These processes ensure that direct engagements with policymakers are subject to executive and board level review and approval. However, the company does not disclose a specific governance policy or process for indirect lobbying through trade associations, nor does it name an individual accountable for climate lobbying oversight. We found no evidence of procedures to evaluate or manage potential misalignment in association memberships or third-party advocacy, indicating moderate but incomplete governance of its lobbying activities.
View Sources
|
C |