Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Tritax Big Box REIT PLC articulates a public commitment to align its engagement activities with global climate objectives, stating: "Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement? […] Yes". This indicates an intention to ensure its interactions reflect Paris-aligned goals, but the company does not disclose any further details on governance structures, monitoring procedures, or oversight mechanisms for lobbying activities. We found no evidence of a named individual or formal body overseeing its policy engagement, nor any process for reviewing direct or indirect lobbying or for managing the positions of industry associations. Therefore, the disclosure remains a broad policy statement without accompanying governance mechanisms.
View Sources
|
D
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Tritax Big Box REIT PLC is relatively open about which climate-related policies it tries to influence, naming the UK Government’s proposals on mandatory climate-related financial disclosures for large companies, the consultation on a performance-based rating framework for large commercial and industrial buildings, and the plan to raise the minimum Energy Performance Certificate threshold for non-domestic buildings to EPC B by 2030. However, it gives almost no detail on how it engages: it simply states that it "engaged with policymakers" without explaining whether this was through meetings, written submissions, trade-association activity or any other channel, and it does not identify the specific departments or officials approached. The company does disclose at least one concrete policy position, opposing the introduction of an interim EPC C milestone in 2027 on the grounds that "Having an interim step might push landlords to have a shorter term view and cause landlords to miss opportunities for economies of scale to undertake significant energy saving initiatives," but it does not set out similarly specific objectives for the other policies it mentions. As a result, while the policies lobbied are clearly identified, the transparency of lobbying mechanisms and the breadth of stated outcomes remain limited.
|
D
|