Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG currently provides no public commitment or position statement to align its engagement activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement, noting in response to the question “Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement?” that “No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years.” The company does not disclose any internal governance mechanisms, oversight structures, or monitoring processes for its lobbying or policy advocacy, nor does it name any individual or body responsible for reviewing or ensuring alignment of either direct or indirect lobbying activities with climate objectives. We found no evidence of any policy, sign-off requirements, or review procedures related to climate lobbying, indicating an absence of a framework to govern its political engagement in line with climate goals.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG provides very limited transparency on its climate-related lobbying. The only policy it names is the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, describing its objective "to categorize packaging according to its recyclability and ultimately to ensure that all packaging on the European market is recyclable," but the company does not indicate that it actually engaged policymakers on this or any other climate-related measure. Likewise, no direct or indirect lobbying mechanisms are disclosed; there is no reference to meetings, submissions, membership activities, or the specific governmental bodies that might have been targeted. The company merely expresses broad aspirations for "higher recycling rates through better collection" and for lowering Extended Producer Responsibility fees, without linking these preferences to concrete legislative changes or amendments it is seeking. As a result, readers gain only a rudimentary sense of the outcomes the company favors and no insight into whether or how it seeks to influence policy.

D