Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Taylor Wimpey provides a highly detailed picture of its climate-related public-policy engagement. It identifies a wide range of specific measures it has worked on, including the Future Homes Standard, amendments to the Levelling-Up and Regeneration Bill, consultations on Permitted Development Rights and Planning Fees, DEFRA’s biodiversity-net-gain templates, discussions on nutrient neutrality, Building Regulations Parts L, F, S and O, and the National Planning Policy Framework and National Model Design Code. The company explains how it engages, citing written responses to government consultations, participation in round-tables and formal working groups, presentations in the House of Lords, direct meetings with ministers such as the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and joint advocacy through trade associations like the Home Builders Federation and the British Property Federation, targeting bodies including DLUHC, DEFRA, BEIS, Homes England, the GLA and local authorities. It is equally explicit about the changes it seeks: for example, it argued that proposed reforms to the National Planning Policy Framework “would not support a more efficient planning system and could result in fewer homes being planned for and delivered,” backed a Planning-fee uplift provided the funds are “ring-fenced” and tied to “new performance measures,” pressed for developer-contribution systems to be “simple, transparent, fair, effective and accountable,” supported amendments to ease nutrient-neutrality constraints, and advocated one unified set of local standards across all regions. Taken together, these disclosures demonstrate a comprehensive level of transparency on the policies addressed, the mechanisms used and the concrete outcomes sought in Taylor Wimpey’s climate-related lobbying. | 4 |