Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Ence’s disclosures outline a robust sustainability governance framework, including a Sustainability Policy “approved by the Board of Directors,” a dedicated Board-level Sustainability Committee that “meets at least once every quarter” and conducts “regular reviews of the company’s climate risk analysis,” and an executive-level Sustainability General Management headed by a Chief Sustainability Officer who “reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer.” However, we found no evidence of any internal mechanisms, oversight structures, or processes specifically governing the company’s direct or indirect lobbying activities, nor disclosure of any individual or committee tasked with reviewing lobbying alignment, any climate-lobbying audit, or any policy that aligns its advocacy efforts with its climate objectives.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
The company offers only limited transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It signals involvement in climate and energy regulation by noting work with the "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment" on the pulp-and-paper BREF document and by listing contacts such as the "Ministry of Industry, Directorate General for Energy Policy and Mines, Autonomous Communities, Local Governments, National Energy Commission, REE, [and] OMIE," but it does not identify any specific pieces of climate legislation or regulations it sought to influence. Its description of how it lobbies is likewise sparse: it says it maintains "a direct relationship with critical sector administrations" and "collaborat[es]" with ministries, yet gives no detail on whether this takes the form of meetings, letters, formal consultations, or work through trade associations. Finally, the company only hints at the purpose of these engagements—promoting biomass as an energy source and supporting regional socio-economic development—without spelling out the concrete policy changes, targets, or amendments it is advocating. Because the disclosures remain high-level and largely qualitative, they provide little insight into the precise policies, mechanisms, or outcomes involved in the company’s climate lobbying.
|
D
|