XL Axiata Tbk PT – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	XL Axiata Tbk PT reports that it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct [its] engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” yet the company does not disclose any oversight structures, processes, or named individuals responsible for governing its lobbying activities, nor does it explain how it monitors direct or indirect advocacy to ensure alignment with its climate commitments. We found no evidence of any specific review procedures, board sign-off, or mechanism for evaluating the consistency of its lobbying with its Paris Agreement commitment. View Sources	D

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Limited

XL Axiata Tbk PT reports that it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct [its] engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” yet the company does not disclose any oversight structures, processes, or named individuals responsible for governing its lobbying activities, nor does it explain how it monitors direct or indirect advocacy to ensure alignment with its climate commitments. We found no evidence of any specific review procedures, board sign-off, or mechanism for evaluating the consistency of its lobbying with its Paris Agreement commitment.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	XL Axiata provides only limited detail on its climate-related lobbying. It identifies a single policy focus—“Paris Agreement that is translated to national goal to achieve net zero emission no later than 2060” in Indonesia—showing it has engaged on the national net-zero target but offering no information on any other climate measures. The company does name the policymaking audience, stating that it engages “the Ministry of Communication and Informatics,” yet the description of the method—“supporting Indonesia's target in achieving net zero emission by encouraging other telecommunication companies to commit to the achievement of Paris Agreement”—remains general and does not clarify whether this support involves meetings, submissions, letters, or other channels. Its policy stance is expressed in broad terms, noting “Support with no exceptions” for the net-zero objective and a desire to see peer companies align, but it does not articulate concrete legislative changes, timelines, or regulatory amendments it seeks. Overall, the disclosure signals some engagement but lacks the specificity needed to give a clear picture of the company’s lobbying actions, mechanisms, and intended outcomes.	D