Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
None |
El.En. SpA relies on its internal sustainability governance framework to coordinate external engagement with climate commitments but does not disclose any specific governance process for its lobbying activities. It explains that “the relationship and dialogue with communities and institutions is managed internally at the Group level and at single subsidiary level,” and that in 2018 the Board of Directors asked its Control and Risk Committee (renamed in 2021 the “Control and Risk, Related Party Transactions and Sustainability Committee”) to review “the company’s sustainability policies and goals and the supervision of the related Plan.” The company further details that an Executive Director in charge of internal control defined its “strategic sustainability guidelines, the Sustainability Plan and the review of the Consolidated NonFinancial Statement,” while a “Global Sustainability Manager” proposes the Group-wide strategy and “submitted the Plan to the Control, Risk and Sustainability Committee,” after which the Plan “was then proposed and approved by El.En.’s Board of Directors and disclosed to all subsidiaries.” Despite this oversight of sustainability, we found no evidence of processes or named individuals responsible for monitoring or managing direct or indirect lobbying, nor any criteria for ensuring lobbying alignment with its climate positions. The company also confirms it does not yet have a public commitment to conduct engagement in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, acknowledging “No, but we plan to have one in the next two years.”
View Sources
|
0 |