Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Advanced Info Service PCL describes a structured sustainability governance framework, noting that the Board of Directors “has assigned the Sustainable Development Committee to consider policy, strategies, goals, and material aspects for sustainability” and that this Committee “reviews performance and assesses impacts and risks” on a quarterly basis as well as “provides consultancy and support to the CEO on driving a sustainable business.” However, we found no evidence that the company discloses any governance mechanisms for its lobbying activities—there is no mention of oversight, monitoring, or alignment processes for direct or indirect lobbying, nor any reference to how its advocacy is aligned with climate or other policy goals.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Advanced Info Service PCL provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It acknowledges upcoming regulation—the Thailand Climate Change Act—yet it does not indicate that the company has tried to influence this or any other specific piece of legislation, so readers cannot see which policies it actually lobbies. The company notes that it “engages stakeholders through industry associations, peers, and local agencies,” giving a general sense of the channels used, but it does not describe concrete actions such as meetings, submissions, or letters, nor does it identify the government bodies or officials that are the focus of these interactions. When explaining its intentions, AIS refers broadly to supporting renewable energy, reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, and offering digital solutions that help customers manage energy use, but it does not spell out the concrete policy changes, amendments, or quantitative targets it seeks. Collectively, this leaves only a high-level picture of aspirations and engagement routes without the detail necessary to understand the company’s actual lobbying positions or objectives.
|
D
|