Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | UniCredit provides an exceptionally detailed picture of its climate-policy advocacy. It names a wide range of specific measures it has engaged on, including the “EU Emission Trading System review,” “Pillar 3 disclosures on ESG risks in accordance with Article 449a CRR,” the “Creation of the EU standard for green bonds,” the “Taxonomy Regulation and relevant Delegated Acts,” and other initiatives covering risk management, corporate ESG disclosure and sustainable corporate-governance rules. The bank also spells out how and with whom it lobbies, describing that it “provided feedback to the trade industry papers and attended the meetings with the EC’s DG CLIMA and ESMA,” “attended the EBA’s public hearing and requested additional details,” and held “meeting[s] with representatives of the European Parliament … and with the representatives of Member States,” thereby identifying both the mechanisms (feedback submissions, public hearings, bilateral meetings) and the concrete targets (DG CLIMA, ESMA, EBA, MEPs, national delegates). Finally, UniCredit is explicit about the outcomes it seeks: it opposed limits on financial-sector participation in the EU ETS because they would “undermine the ability of many companies to manage their risks” and could “negatively affect the investments in new technologies”; it supported Pillar 3 ESG disclosures “to ensure a proper disclosure”; it advocated that the green-bond standard allow “full-grandfathering” and “20 percent of flexibility” for certain projects; and it pushes for the “finalization of EU Taxonomy” and a “sustainable finance supporting factor linked to the EU taxonomy.” By detailing the policies, the engagement channels and the precise policy positions, the company demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying. | 4 |