Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
IGO Ltd integrates climate change into broad corporate governance, highlighting that “Climate change is a material and strategic priority for IGO and is therefore part of ongoing discussions and analysis at the most senior levels of management and the Board” and noting that “The IGO Board and Executive Leadership have ultimate oversight of climate change management.” The “Board’s Sustainability Committee oversees and monitors IGO’s risk framework and management systems in relation to sustainability areas” and meets regularly to review climate risks. However, we found no evidence of any governance process specific to lobbying activities—there is no disclosure of how direct or indirect lobbying is monitored or aligned with climate objectives, no mention of policies or procedures for approving lobbying positions, no indication of engagement with or oversight of industry associations, and no named individual or committee charged with overseeing lobbying alignment—indicating an absence of lobbying governance disclosure.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
IGO Ltd offers only limited transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It signals a general intention to “engage with our peers, governments, and society to share solutions and participate in the debate required to create effective public policy on climate change,” and it notes participation in the Electric Mine Consortium, but it never identifies which government departments, legislators, or jurisdictions it contacts, nor does it describe specific tools such as meetings, letters, or submissions. On substance, the company refers broadly to topics such as “greater use of renewable energy,” “a price on carbon,” and the need for an “effective binding global agreement on climate change,” yet it does not link these themes to any named bill, regulation, or rule. Likewise, the outcomes it hopes to achieve are framed only as general aspirations—support for carbon pricing and market mechanisms or the transition to zero-emission mining—without measurable policy changes, timetables, or positions on concrete proposals. As a result, while the disclosures acknowledge an interest in influencing climate policy, they leave readers with minimal insight into what policies are actually being addressed, how the company is trying to influence them, or what specific regulatory changes it seeks.
|
D
|