Zhen Ding Technology Holding Ltd

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Zhen Ding Technology Holding Ltd outlines its climate governance framework by noting that it “attended several seminars held by the local government to discuss and suggest the detailed policy information about the carbon trade in Shenzhen” and affirming a “public commitment … to conduct … engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement.” It states that its “climate change governance and management framework is under the direct supervision of the Board of Directors,” with the Sustainability Executive Council responsible for establishing mid- to long-term strategies and the Environment and Energy Conservation division “formulating climate change adaptation and mitigation management plans, reviews implementation status and discusses future plans, and reports to the Board of Directors through the ESG Committee every quarter.” While this demonstrates senior oversight and a clear commitment to align engagement with climate goals, the company does not disclose specific processes for monitoring or managing its lobbying or policy advocacy activities, nor does it name a dedicated owner or set out a formal review process for its direct or indirect lobbying efforts.

View Sources

D
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Zhen Ding Technology Holding Ltd provides only a basic outline of its climate-related advocacy. It indicates that it “participates in industry associations and engages in dialogues with legislators” and that these interactions may involve bodies such as the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China and the Shenzhen pilot Emissions Trading Scheme, but it does not name any concrete bills, regulations or rule-makings it has tried to influence. The company lists broad channels of influence—industry associations and direct discussions with officials—yet offers no further detail on specific meetings, letters, consultations or the individual policymakers approached. Likewise, the disclosure speaks generally of supporting “climate-related targets” and aligning with the Paris Agreement without setting out the precise policy changes, amendments or numeric goals it is advocating. As a result, while Zhen Ding acknowledges some engagement with climate policy, it is not transparent about the exact policies, the methods used, or the outcomes it seeks.

D