Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Ameresco discloses only limited elements of an internal process for managing its policy advocacy. It notes that “throughout all of our public policy work, ethics and integrity are paramount. We adhere to the highest standards and conduct several forms of training related to lobbying, including annual training and certification regarding our company’s Code,” which indicates at least one recurring compliance step tied to lobbying activities. The company also provides transparency on spending by stating that “Ameresco’s federal lobbying expenses for 2022 are publicly disclosed on quarterly reports filed with the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and Secretary of the U.S. Senate pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act,” but these are statutory filings rather than a self-defined governance mechanism. While it outlines the substantive climate-related positions it advocates for—“Ameresco works closely… to advocate for policies that support clean energy deployment, energy efficiency, and carbon reduction”—the evidence does not describe how those positions are internally reviewed, who signs off on them, or how alignment with the company’s climate strategy is assured, nor does it mention oversight of indirect lobbying through industry associations. We found no disclosure of a board committee, executive officer, or formal procedure that evaluates or corrects misalignment between lobbying and climate goals. As such, the disclosure demonstrates only a basic training and compliance approach, without a clearly defined governance framework for climate lobbying alignment.
View Sources
|
1 |