Salesforce Inc

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Comprehensive Salesforce provides extensive and concrete information about its climate-policy lobbying. It names numerous individual measures it has worked on, including the U.S. SEC’s proposed Climate Disclosure Rule, the Inflation Reduction Act, the COP15 Global Biodiversity Framework (Target 15), the European Green Deal and Fit-for-55 package, REPowerEU, the Paris Agreement, the U.K.’s 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution, and state legislation such as Virginia’s decision to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. The company also describes a wide array of engagement methods and clearly identifies its targets: submitting an official response to the SEC, “conven[ing] 30+ meetings to discuss federal climate legislation” with U.S. Congress, drafting an op-ed, signing joint CEO letters to the EU Commission and to the U.K. Prime Minister, joining “the largest climate-focused business gathering on Capitol Hill,” and collaborating with more than 400 institutions to influence governments at COP15. Finally, Salesforce is explicit about the outcomes it seeks—for example, it backed the SEC rule while proposing specific implementation amendments, urged adoption of COP15 Target 15 requiring biodiversity reporting, pressed the U.K. to adopt an NDC “in line with a net-zero emissions by 2050 target,” supported an EU emissions-reduction goal of “at least 55% by 2030,” and advocated U.S. re-entry into the Paris Agreement and a national trajectory to net-zero by 2050. By detailing the specific policies, the mechanisms and audiences for its lobbying, and the concrete changes it wants to see, Salesforce demonstrates a very high level of transparency around its climate-related advocacy. 4
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Salesforce discloses a defined internal process for keeping its policy advocacy consistent with its climate ambitions, noting that all policy engagement must be directed through its dedicated Government Affairs and Public Policy group to ensure alignment, and that this global team regularly holds meetings with senior leadership to align. The company adds that it regularly hold[s] sustainability meetings with senior leadership including the CFO and Chief Impact Officer to review and report on progress, which indicates that named executives are involved in oversight rather than merely executing lobbying. This demonstrates a mechanism for reviewing and managing the companys own (direct) engagements, complemented by a public pledge that its activities are in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. However, the disclosures do not describe how Salesforce monitors or manages its indirect lobbying through trade associations, nor do they mention any formal audit, escalation criteria when trade assoications positions diverge from the companys climate strategy. Consequently, while the presence of a central policy team and senior-leadership reviews indicates moderate governance, the absence of detailed monitoring procedures, trade-association alignment checks, and publicly released lobbying-alignment assessments limits the overall strength and transparency of the framework. 2