Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board Corp – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board Corp discloses a defined internal procedure to keep its climate-related advocacy aligned with its overall strategy, stating that “Prior to attending any climate change related engagements, NYPCB appoints members of the General Manager’s Office or the Sustainable Development Team on behalf of NYPCB” and that “Issues and opinions are to be reviewed and approved by associated department heads prior to the representative [participating] on behalf of NYPCB.” This demonstrates a formal review and sign-off mechanism that precedes any external engagement. The company also indicates a Paris-aligned intent, noting it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” which signals a policy basis for alignment. Oversight responsibility is assigned to identifiable internal bodies—the General Manager’s Office, the Sustainable Development Team and relevant department heads—suggesting clear lines of accountability, although no single named executive or board committee is cited. However, the disclosure focuses solely on direct participation and provides no information on how the company monitors or manages lobbying conducted through trade associations, nor does it describe any periodic audit, board-level review, or corrective actions if misalignment occurs. Therefore, while the company reveals a concrete process and oversight structure for climate-related engagements, the governance detail remains moderate and lacks evidence of comprehensive monitoring of both direct and indirect lobbying channels. View Sources	C

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Moderate

Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board Corp discloses a defined internal procedure to keep its climate-related advocacy aligned with its overall strategy, stating that “Prior to attending any climate change related engagements, NYPCB appoints members of the General Manager’s Office or the Sustainable Development Team on behalf of NYPCB” and that “Issues and opinions are to be reviewed and approved by associated department heads prior to the representative [participating] on behalf of NYPCB.” This demonstrates a formal review and sign-off mechanism that precedes any external engagement. The company also indicates a Paris-aligned intent, noting it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” which signals a policy basis for alignment. Oversight responsibility is assigned to identifiable internal bodies—the General Manager’s Office, the Sustainable Development Team and relevant department heads—suggesting clear lines of accountability, although no single named executive or board committee is cited. However, the disclosure focuses solely on direct participation and provides no information on how the company monitors or manages lobbying conducted through trade associations, nor does it describe any periodic audit, board-level review, or corrective actions if misalignment occurs. Therefore, while the company reveals a concrete process and oversight structure for climate-related engagements, the governance detail remains moderate and lacks evidence of comprehensive monitoring of both direct and indirect lobbying channels.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	No evidence found	E