Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
Indian Oil Corp Ltd discloses extensive climate-related oversight structures, noting that “The Company has a Board Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainable Development (CSR & SD)” and that it has “established interdivisional corporate climate action committees to develop divisional targets, review new projects’ contribution to the mitigation plan, monitor corporate communication disclosures, monitor progress, and assess the allocation of resources in line with Net Zero Commitments,” with performance reviews “Periodically by Board Committees/Director” and additional scrutiny via audits and regulatory reviews. However, we found no evidence of any process or policy specifically governing its direct or indirect lobbying activities, nor any mention of oversight, monitoring, or alignment of lobbying with the company’s climate objectives.
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Indian Oil Corporation provides only limited visibility into its climate-policy advocacy. It does refer to two identifiable Indian initiatives—the National Policy on Biofuels and the Sustainable Alternative Towards Affordable Transportation (SATAT) programme—indicating that these are areas where it has engaged, but it gives no further detail on which sections of those policies it influenced or whether these are the only climate measures it lobbies on. The company briefly describes how it acts, noting activities such as "Facilitating with Govts, regulatory/ nodal agencies for identifying, allocating, registering land banks, project capacities, evacuation modalities, RoWs/ RoUs etc." and that it "Advise[s] on policy advisory (internal & external), policy development for RE business within IndianOil," yet it does not say whether this involves meetings, written submissions, trade associations or other routes, nor does it name the specific ministries, regulators or legislators it approaches. Finally, its public statements are confined to broad ambitions—supporting renewable-energy growth, biofuels and sustainable transport—without spelling out any concrete legislative amendments, targets or regulatory changes it seeks. Taken together, the disclosures give only a high-level picture of the company’s climate lobbying, with key details on targets, methods and desired outcomes still missing.
|
D
|