Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Macquarie Group offers only limited insight into how it governs climate-related lobbying. The company states that it has a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and explains that, following this commitment, it “established a dedicated cross-group Net Zero Program team to coordinate Macquarie-wide climate risk and net zero activity… reporting to the Macquarie Group CRO and Executive Committee,” while also noting that “Macquarie senior leaders attended COP26, engaging with government, business and industry leaders.” Its public-policy section outlines the channels it uses to influence legislation – “making submissions to industry consultation processes… engaging with parliamentarians and policy-makers… [and] contributing to the advocacy work done by industry groups” – and discloses that “Macquarie has a full disclosure policy and declares all monies paid to political parties to the Australian Electoral Commission.” However, we found no evidence of a formal process that reviews whether these lobbying positions are consistent with the company’s net-zero strategy, no description of criteria for assessing the climate positions of the industry associations it funds, and no reference to a named board committee or individual specifically tasked with overseeing lobbying alignment. The information provided therefore indicates only a general commitment and high-level climate governance, without a clearly articulated mechanism for monitoring or enforcing alignment of either direct or indirect lobbying with the company’s climate goals.
View Sources
|
1 |