Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
EQT AB emphasizes its ability to influence portfolio companies’ strategic direction by “aligning governance structures with decarbonization goals” and embedding decarbonization “into every stage of the deal cycle and investment process,” while collaborating with “policymakers, local governments, and regulators to support and incentivize change.” However, the company does not disclose any internal mechanisms or oversight structures for managing or reviewing its direct or indirect lobbying activities, nor does it reference any specific individual or formal body responsible for aligning its policy engagement with its decarbonization objectives, indicating no transparency around its lobbying governance processes.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
EQT Group provides only high-level statements about its interest in climate issues, offering virtually no concrete detail on its lobbying activities. It does not identify any specific laws, regulations or negotiation texts it has tried to influence; references to themes such as the New Collective Quantified Goal, carbon-tax credit markets or renewable-energy permitting are framed as topics of interest rather than policies on which the company has actually lobbied. Likewise, the disclosures describe general intentions to “engage in dialogue with politicians, decision-makers and the public at COP29” and to collaborate with local governments on incentives for electric buses and ferries, but they never explain how this engagement occurs or name the governmental bodies or officials that are approached. The company’s stated objectives remain broad aspirations—such as establishing “a clear framework … to guarantee that fossil fuels are phased out by 2050” and accelerating permitting—without articulating the specific legislative or regulatory outcomes it is seeking. Overall, the information offered is too vague to demonstrate meaningful transparency on climate-related lobbying.
|
D
|