Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Siemens Energy offers a highly transparent picture of its climate-policy lobbying. It names a wide array of concrete pieces of legislation it engages on – for example the revisions of the Energy Taxation Directive, Renewable Energy Directive II and III, TEN-E Regulation, EU Emissions Trading System, F-Gas Regulation, ReFuelEU Aviation, the EU Taxonomy Delegated Act, the Energy Efficiency Directive and many others – specifying the policy title, the stage of the legislative process and the geographic scope. The company also describes in detail how it seeks to influence those files, citing multiple routes such as “participating in public consultations by the European Commission”, submitting position papers, holding “bilateral talks with decision-makers at EU level”, and working “individually as well as via trade associations”; it identifies clear targets including the European Commission (DG CLIMA, DG TAXUD, DG MOVE, etc.), the European Parliament, Member-State governments and the European Chemicals Agency. Finally, Siemens Energy sets out the concrete outcomes it pursues: it advocates “to strengthen the CO2 link in energy taxation and allow Member States to exempt carbon-neutral fuels”, calls for “ambitious quotas for e-fuels in transport”, seeks “regulatory eligibility for green hydrogen” and a “differentiated phase-out for SF6 in high-voltage equipment”, asks for a “voluntary crediting system for renewable fuels” in vehicle CO2 standards, and supports carbon contracts for difference and a minimum CO2 price within the EU ETS, among many other specific positions. By coupling these detailed policy goals with clear descriptions of both the mechanisms and the targets of its lobbying, the company demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-related advocacy activities. | 4 |