SCOR SE – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	SCOR SE provides some insight into how it seeks to keep its policy-influencing and wider engagement consistent with its climate goals, noting that it "has decided to join several initiatives like the Climate Action 100+ one for efficient engagement" and that "the Climate Action 100+ framework and especially the Climate Action 100+ benchmark … ensure that SCOR external engagement activities are consistent with its climate commitments." It further explains that "SCOR uses the Net-Zero benchmark to monitor investees progress towards net-zero GHG emissions in 2050" and recognises that its involvement in the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance means that "the NZAOA also publishes some position papers that may contain recommendations to policymakers: this is an indirect involvement for SCOR that is aligned with its climate commitments." These disclosures demonstrate a defined process to check alignment and give examples of how the company actively seeks to keep indirect lobbying and engagement, via CA100+ and the NZAOA, in line with its Paris-aligned objectives, indicating moderate governance. However, the company does not disclose who within the organisation reviews or signs off on climate-related lobbying positions, nor does it describe how its own direct advocacy towards policymakers is monitored, so the depth of oversight, frequency of reviews, and board-level accountability remain unclear. View Sources	C

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Moderate

SCOR SE provides some insight into how it seeks to keep its policy-influencing and wider engagement consistent with its climate goals, noting that it "has decided to join several initiatives like the Climate Action 100+ one for efficient engagement" and that "the Climate Action 100+ framework and especially the Climate Action 100+ benchmark … ensure that SCOR external engagement activities are consistent with its climate commitments." It further explains that "SCOR uses the Net-Zero benchmark to monitor investees progress towards net-zero GHG emissions in 2050" and recognises that its involvement in the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance means that "the NZAOA also publishes some position papers that may contain recommendations to policymakers: this is an indirect involvement for SCOR that is aligned with its climate commitments." These disclosures demonstrate a defined process to check alignment and give examples of how the company actively seeks to keep indirect lobbying and engagement, via CA100+ and the NZAOA, in line with its Paris-aligned objectives, indicating moderate governance. However, the company does not disclose who within the organisation reviews or signs off on climate-related lobbying positions, nor does it describe how its own direct advocacy towards policymakers is monitored, so the depth of oversight, frequency of reviews, and board-level accountability remain unclear.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	SCOR SE provides a clear account of its engagement mechanisms by naming both its membership in coalitions like the Net Zero Engagement Initiative and Nature Action 100 and its direct contributions to the Climate and Sustainable Finance Commission of the French Market Authority, where it is explicitly involved in “contributing to the development of methodologies,” “providing technical expertise,” and “offering opinions on draft reports and regulatory texts.” However, the company only refers to broad policy areas—such as “mandatory climate-related reporting,” “transparency requirements,” and “climate-related targets”—without identifying specific laws or regulations. Its outcomes statements focus on general aspirations like supporting the transition to a sustainable economy, achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, and improving methods for measuring and reporting climate commitments, but they do not specify desired changes to particular regulatory measures or targets. These disclosures reflect insight into its lobbying approach yet lack precise identification of policies lobbied and concrete policy outcomes sought to demonstrate full transparency.	C