Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Marui Group discloses a basic internal process intended to keep its policy engagement aligned with its climate strategy, stating that for direct advocacy "ã€ ç›´æŽ¥å ”åƒ ã€‘…ESG委員会ç‰ã §ã ®å ±å‘Šãƒ・共有…㠮プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ã«ã‚ˆã£ã ¦…é©å®œæ–¹å‘性ã®ä¸€è‡´ã‚’ç¢ºèª ã•ã‚‹" and, for engagement through industry bodies, "〠æ¥ç•Œå›£ä½“を通ã—㠦〠…ESG委員会ç‰ã §ã ®å ±å‘Šãƒ・共有…㠮プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ã«ã‚ˆã£ã ¦…é©å®œæ–¹å‘性ã®ä¸€è‡´ã‚’ç¢ºèª ã•ã‚‹", indicating that its ESG Committee reviews reports on both direct and trade-association activities to check consistency with its climate objectives. The company also confirms that it has "a public commitment…to conduct…engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." This shows a named internal body overseeing alignment and a stated commitment to Paris-aligned lobbying, suggesting a moderate level of governance. However, Marui does not disclose the frequency or depth of these reviews, provide criteria for assessing trade-association positions, or publish any detailed lobbying-alignment report, so the transparency and robustness of the process remain limited.
View Sources
|
C |