Sun Life Financial Inc

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Comprehensive Sun Life Financial provides a very detailed picture of its climate-policy engagement. It names multiple specific measures it has worked on, including the federal government’s “Green Building Strategy,” OSFI’s draft “Guideline B-15: Climate Risk Management,” the SEC’s proposed “Rules to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors,” Canada’s “Net-Zero Challenge,” the Canadian Securities Administrators’ proposed “National Instrument 51-107,” and the U.S. NAIC “Climate Risk Disclosure Survey,” among others. The company is equally explicit about how it engages: it describes “responding to consultations and engaging with policymakers and securities regulators individually and/or through industry associations,” “submitt[ing] both high-level and detailed comments on the draft guideline,” “meet[ing] with Environment and Climate Change Canada policy staff multiple times,” “contribut[ing] to the ACLI’s remarks,” and raising recommendations in “individual and trade association-led meetings with federal officials,” thereby revealing both direct and indirect mechanisms and naming concrete targets such as OSFI, the SEC, NAIC, Environment and Climate Change Canada, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Bermuda Monetary Authority and the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Finally, it is clear about what it seeks to achieve: it has “recommended delaying implementation to align with forthcoming climate disclosure standards,” “requested leniency on some requirements due to methodological and data availability constraints,” called for “mandatory economy-wide climate-related financial reporting” while asking for flexibility on Scope 3 and scenario analysis, and pressed for “closer alignment with emerging climate transition plan best practices.” These specific, outcome-oriented positions, coupled with statements of “support with minor exceptions” or “support with no exceptions” and confirmation that the engagements are “aligned with the Paris Agreement,” demonstrate a high level of transparency across all aspects of its climate-related lobbying. 4
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Sun Life Financial Inc has established governance structures that integrate its policy engagement with its climate commitments, primarily through collaboration between its Government and Regulatory Affairs team and its Sustainability function. Specifically, the Government and Regulatory Affairs team “works closely with the Sustainability team and Chief Sustainability Officer” and includes “a resource in Government and Regulatory Affairs designated to work with the Sustainability team on climate-related issues” to “coordinate external engagement activities pertaining to our climate commitments.” Oversight is provided at the highest levels: the “Board of Directors has ultimate oversight of the enterprise approach to climate change,” with the Governance, Investment & Sustainability Committee monitoring net-zero progress and the Risk Committee overseeing climate-related risks. The firm further names its Chief Sustainability Officer as accountable for sustainability and for “advocating for strong government policies and regulations” in support of a lower-carbon economy and designates its Vice-President, Climate Change and Environmental Impact to “oversee the development and implementation of the enterprise-wide climate change strategy.” While this indicates clear ownership and structured coordination for aligning direct policy engagement with climate goals, the company does not disclose a formal process for monitoring or reviewing lobbying alignment, nor any mechanism for addressing indirect lobbying through trade associations or external bodies. 2