Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Barclays PLC demonstrates a very high level of transparency about its climate-policy lobbying. It names a wide array of concrete rule-makings and consultations it has engaged with, including the “European Securities and Markets Authority Call for Evidence on ESG ratings”, the UK “Government Net Zero Review: Call for Evidence”, HM Treasury’s “UK Green Taxonomy Consultations”, the “Transition Plans Task Force Consultation on a Sector-Neutral Framework for Private-Sector Transition Plans”, and bilateral submissions to the FCA on Sustainability Disclosure Requirements, among many others. The bank also explains how it lobbies and whom it targets: it “submitted bilateral responses” to regulators, “exchanged views with Members of the European Parliament and Financial Attachés of EU member states”, held “meetings with the Clean Growth and Energy Minister”, and engages “via trade organisations (Association for Financial Markets in Europe) and (American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union)”, providing a clear picture of both direct and indirect mechanisms and the specific authorities (ESMA, European Commission, BEIS, HMT, FCA, PRA, ISSB) it seeks to influence. Finally, Barclays is explicit about the concrete outcomes it pursues, advocating for measures such as “re-introduce capital allowance incentives” to drive energy-efficiency upgrades in SME premises, issuance of a UK Sovereign Green/Sustainability Bond, a “detailed hydrogen roadmap” backed by demand-side support and revenue-certainty mechanisms, a principles-based UK green taxonomy aligned with the EU framework, and bringing ESG ratings providers “into the regulatory perimeter”. Together these disclosures provide granular insight into the policies addressed, the methods used, and the precise legislative or regulatory changes Barclays seeks, illustrating comprehensive transparency over its climate-related lobbying activity. | 4 |