Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Magyar Telekom outlines a structured approach to ensure its engagements reflect its climate objectives, noting that through “intensive cooperation between Group Corporate Responsibility, Corporate Communications and Politics and Regulatory affairs” it “ensure[s] that our engagement within industry anssociations is in line with group climate strategy and policy.” The company highlights that “sustainablity experts are representing DT in various associations, as e.g. GeSI Board or as Chair of the ETNO Sustainable Development Working Group,” and explains that “Magyar Telekom is also member of ETNO Sustainable Development WG since launching the Sustainability Charter, and the colleague, who is coordinating sustainability strategy (inlc. Climate strategy) is delegated” to manage these activities. It further confirms a public stance to align its advocacy efforts with Paris goals by answering “Yes” when asked if it has a position statement to conduct engagement in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. While this indicates clear processes to govern indirect lobbying through trade and industry bodies and identifies a designated sustainability coordinator, the company does not disclose how its direct lobbying is systematically reviewed or managed for alignment with its climate strategy.
View Sources
|
2 |