Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong | Dentsu Group discloses a solid amount of detail on its climate-policy advocacy. It identifies two concrete policy areas it has tried to influence: Japan’s statutory “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation, Reporting and Public Disclosure System” and the push for new rules on climate misinformation and disinformation that it presented to COP27 delegates, the UNFCCC and major social-media platforms. The company also sets out the channels it uses and whom it addresses. These include submitting annual 地球温暖化対策計画書 (Global Warming Countermeasure Plans) to the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, direct engagement with Japan’s Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and signing two open letters coordinated by the We Mean Business Coalition that were sent to the COP Presidency, individual country delegations, the UNFCCC and the CEOs of Meta, Google, Twitter, TikTok and Reddit. In addition, it records broader coalition work through bodies such as the WBCSD and Ad Net Zero. For the named policy areas Dentsu spells out the results it seeks: supporting Japan’s effort to compel companies to calculate, report and disclose emissions, and securing “a clear plan for action against climate misinformation and disinformation”, including universal definitions and preventative measures by online platforms. While its disclosures are focused on a limited set of policies, the combination of specific policy references, clear lobbying mechanisms with identified targets, and stated policy objectives reflects a strong level of transparency around its climate lobbying activity. | 3 |