Lucid Group Inc – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Lucid Group Inc articulates a strong stance on climate-related policy by stating that “Lucid strongly advocates for stringent environmental policies such as efficiency incentives, stronger greenhouse gas emissions standards, and related regulatory topics,” and asserts that “All advocacy is compliant with the laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction and with Lucid’s Lobbying Policy, which has been reviewed and approved by senior management.” The company highlights that it has “a dedicated Public Policy team engaging with national, local, and regional governments” and that “We have filed publicly available comments with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and several other U.S. states,” while in the EU it engages via “Lucid Europe B.V. (part of the European Transparency Register (935776746396-92))” to influence policy. However, the company does not disclose any specific procedures for monitoring or managing the alignment of its direct or indirect lobbying efforts with its climate objectives, does not name an individual or formal body responsible for reviewing lobbying alignment, and provides no evidence of climate-lobbying audits or assessments of industry associations’ positions, indicating limited governance transparency around its climate lobbying. View Sources	1

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Limited

Lucid Group Inc articulates a strong stance on climate-related policy by stating that “Lucid strongly advocates for stringent environmental policies such as efficiency incentives, stronger greenhouse gas emissions standards, and related regulatory topics,” and asserts that “All advocacy is compliant with the laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction and with Lucid’s Lobbying Policy, which has been reviewed and approved by senior management.” The company highlights that it has “a dedicated Public Policy team engaging with national, local, and regional governments” and that “We have filed publicly available comments with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and several other U.S. states,” while in the EU it engages via “Lucid Europe B.V. (part of the European Transparency Register (935776746396-92))” to influence policy. However, the company does not disclose any specific procedures for monitoring or managing the alignment of its direct or indirect lobbying efforts with its climate objectives, does not name an individual or formal body responsible for reviewing lobbying alignment, and provides no evidence of climate-lobbying audits or assessments of industry associations’ positions, indicating limited governance transparency around its climate lobbying.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Strong	Lucid Group provides an unusually detailed picture of its climate-policy advocacy. It openly identifies specific regulations it has engaged on, including the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and later, the EU’s Euro 7 Proposal, and the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Regulation, demonstrating that it discloses the precise measures under discussion. The company also clarifies how, and with whom, it lobbies: its Public Policy team engages directly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board and EU policymakers, and it pursues indirect advocacy through trade bodies such as The European Association for Electromobility and the Zero Emission Transportation Association, with its EU entity listed on the European Transparency Register. Finally, Lucid is explicit about the policy outcomes it seeks, backing the strictest alternative within the EPA rule to accelerate tail-pipe emissions reductions, supporting minimum battery-durability requirements and efficiency incentives under Euro 7, and calling for harmonised smart and bidirectional charging standards in the EU infrastructure regulation. Together, these disclosures show a high level of transparency on the policies addressed, the channels used and the changes the company is advocating.	3