Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Deutsche Post DHL Group provides extensive and detailed disclosure of its climate-related public-policy engagement. It names a wide array of specific legislative and regulatory files it lobbies on, including the “Review of EU ETS,” the “Energy Taxation Directive,” the “German CO2 Price,” the “EU Renewable Energy Directive Review (RED II),” “Refuel EU Aviation,” “Refuel EU Maritime,” “AFIR,” “Count Emissions EU,” the “Weights and Dimensions Directive review,” elements of the “US Infrastructure Investment Act” such as the national charging network and airport-modernisation provisions, as well as earlier consultations on the “EU Green Taxonomy” and other sustainable-finance measures. The company is equally clear about how and where it seeks to influence these measures: it describes “several discussions with responsible DGs in Brussels (DG MOVE, DG RTD, DG ENER),” “active contribution to public consultations,” publication of a white paper on sustainable fuels, and bilateral engagement with “governmental and non-governmental stakeholders in Germany,” alongside registration in the EU, German Bundestag and US lobbying registers. Finally, it spells out the concrete outcomes it is pursuing, calling for policies that “continue to incentivize bridging technologies such as Bio-LNG and HVO,” “tighten fleet limits (CO2 standards),” create “long-term funding programs for alternative vehicles, esp. market activation for H2 trucks,” introduce “a carbon price instead of a traditional tax so that the revenue … can be re-invested for the purpose of promoting sustainable transport solutions,” and establish “reliable sustainability safeguards for alternative fuels” and “carefully defined blending mandates.” By describing the policies, the mechanisms and targets of engagement, and the precise policy changes it seeks, the Group demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-policy lobbying activities. | 4 |